Library Subject Guides

I am in the process of working with our university's Web team in redesigning the library's Web site. Currently, we are working on our Subject Guides. Out of curiosity, I looked at 22 area university libraries to see how they presented their Subject Guides:

  • 10 have links to a list of their subject guides
  • 1 has a drop down list of all their guides
  • 11 do not have any reference to subject guides on their homepage.

Of those who refer to their subject guides, the following language was used:

  • e-Resources & Research Guides by Subject
  • Resources by Subject
  • Databases by Subject (3 libraries)
  • Subject Resources
  • Research Guides by Subject
  • Subject Specific Resources
  • Get Research Help by Subject
  • Find Articles by Subject
  • Browse by Subject

Right now, we're using the term "Subject Guide." In my original test design, I used a drop down box with a complete list of all subjects. Our the Web team wants to have a roll-over, but our subject list is too extensive to have in a roll-over, so one option we are discussing is just having a link to a complete list. I like the idea of having a drop down box or some other mechanism for revealing what one might find via the subject guides. However, seeing that 10 of 22 schools have only a link eases my concern somewhat. I'm just not sure if students will think to click on "Subject Guides" without any indication of where they are going. We could change the language, but seeing that 11 schools use 9 different phrases, there's obviously no consensus as to what language patrons will understand.

More on Wikipedia Founder Dismissing Academic Use

The Chronicle of Higher Education article about Wikipedia founder, Jimmy Wales, discouraging the use of Wikipedia was well-reported when it came out the other day, but it's interesting to go back and read the numerous comments that have since been posted.

When I teach my freshman writing class, I always direct them to our library databases, not so much out of any disregard for Internet sites like Wikipedia, but mainly because I want them to learn how to use the databases.  We do cover evaluating Web sites, but I've never directly address using Wikipedia.  One aspect I haven't brought up, which I need to, is the fact that sites like Wikipedia can change.  A student can properly use and cite an article from Wikipedia, but that information could be gone or changed by the time I go to double-check.  Obviously, this is true for any Web site.  I guess my point is that I have to take this fact into consideration when teaching how to evaluate a Web site.  Not only should we consider the reliability and authorship of a site, but also consider the stability of the site.  How likely is it that this information will still be available down the road?